IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS
AND ANR ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr. Prashant Bhushan and Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Rajeev Mehra, ASG with
Ms. Richa Kapoor, standing counsel for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN
O R D E R
09.01.2013
List this matter before a Bench in which one of us (V.K.JAIN, J.) is not a member.
List before DB-II on 10.1.2013.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V.K. JAIN, J
JANUARY 09, 2013
sn
$ 27
=================================================================================================================
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS
AND ANR ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr. Prashant Bhushan and Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Rajeev Mehra, ASG with
Ms. Richa Kapoor, standing counsel for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN
O R D E R
09.01.2013
List this matter before a Bench in which one of us (V.K.JAIN, J.) is not a member.
List before DB-II on 10.1.2013.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V.K. JAIN, J
JANUARY 09, 2013
sn
$ 27
=================================================================================================================
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR
..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Prashant Bhushan and
Mr.Pranav Sachdeva, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondent
Through:Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
Ms.Richa Kapoor, CGSC with
Mr.Aditya Malhotra, Advocate for
R-1/UOI.
Mr.P.R.Chopra, Adv.for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
10.01.2013
Let R-1 and R-2 place their stand on record within two weeks from
today.
List on 04.02.2013.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JANUARY 10, 2013/dm
===============================================================================================================
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR
..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Prashant Bhushan and
Mr.Pranav Sachdeva, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondent
Through:Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
Ms.Richa Kapoor, CGSC with
Mr.Aditya Malhotra, Advocate for
R-1/UOI.
Mr.P.R.Chopra, Adv.for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
10.01.2013
Let R-1 and R-2 place their stand on record within two weeks from
today.
List on 04.02.2013.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JANUARY 10, 2013/dm
===============================================================================================================
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR
... Petitioners
Through : Mr. Prashant Bhushan with
Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ... Respondents
Through : Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for
R ? 1/UOI.
Mr. P.R. Chopra, Adv. for R ? 2/ECI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
04.02.2013
The stand of respondents No. 1 and 2 has been placed on record.
The stand shows that in view of the recommendations made by the Election
Commission of India and on examination of the matter, the Government of
India itself has called upon respondents No. 3 and 4 to explain their
respective stands, but the stand of only respondent No. 3 is stated to
have been received. Thus, as to what is the final stand of the
Government of India has still not been placed on record.
W.P.(C) 131/2013 Page 1 of 2
The second aspect is that there is an additional issue raised in the
writ petition qua contributions made by the public sector enterprises and
the State Governments and learned ASG states that the affidavit filed by
him does not cover that aspect. Four weeks? time, as prayed for, is
granted to place the stand(s) on record.
Let notice to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued,
returnable on 19.03.2013.
Learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2 accepts notice.
Respondents No. 3 and 4 be served dasti as well.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
FEBRUARY 04, 2013 INDERMEET KAUR, J.
madan
W.P.(C) 131/2013 Page 2 of 2
$
==================================================================================================
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR
... Petitioners
Through : Mr. Prashant Bhushan with
Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ... Respondents
Through : Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for
R ? 1/UOI.
Mr. P.R. Chopra, Adv. for R ? 2/ECI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
04.02.2013
The stand of respondents No. 1 and 2 has been placed on record.
The stand shows that in view of the recommendations made by the Election
Commission of India and on examination of the matter, the Government of
India itself has called upon respondents No. 3 and 4 to explain their
respective stands, but the stand of only respondent No. 3 is stated to
have been received. Thus, as to what is the final stand of the
Government of India has still not been placed on record.
W.P.(C) 131/2013 Page 1 of 2
The second aspect is that there is an additional issue raised in the
writ petition qua contributions made by the public sector enterprises and
the State Governments and learned ASG states that the affidavit filed by
him does not cover that aspect. Four weeks? time, as prayed for, is
granted to place the stand(s) on record.
Let notice to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued,
returnable on 19.03.2013.
Learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2 accepts notice.
Respondents No. 3 and 4 be served dasti as well.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
FEBRUARY 04, 2013 INDERMEET KAUR, J.
madan
W.P.(C) 131/2013 Page 2 of 2
$
==================================================================================================
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR
..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Prashant Bhushan and Mr.Pranav Sachdeva, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Rajiv Mehra, ASG with Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate for R-1.
Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for R-2.
Mr.K.C.Mittal and Ms.Anjali Nehra, Advocate for R-3.
Ms.Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv., Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Anil Soni,
Mr.S.S.Shamshery, Advocates for R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
19.03.2013
Respondents no.3 and 4 have been served and have entered
appearance.
Insofar as respondent no.1 is concerned, learned counsel for
respondent no.1 states that an affidavit has been filed but it covers
part of the first aspect raised in the order dated 04.02.2013. It is
stated that a further affidavit would be required to be filed qua the
remaining part of the first issue and the second issue.
W.P.(C) 131/2013 Page 1 of 2
A perusal of the affidavit filed in pursuance to the last order
shows that inter-ministerial co-ordination is required and thus an
officer of sufficient seniority to affirm the affidavit to be filed
within four weeks as prayed for.
Copies of the affidavit filed by respondent no.1 be also supplied
to respondents no.3 and 4 who may file their counter affidavits within
three weeks thereafter as prayed for meeting not only the allegations in
the petition but also any allegation which they would like to meet as set
out in the affidavit of the Union of India.
Rejoinders be filed within two weeks as prayed for.
List on 16.7.2013.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 19, 2013
nandan
W.P.(C) 131/2013 Page 2 of 2
$ 3
========================================================================================
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR
..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Prashant Bhushan and Mr.Pranav Sachdeva, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Rajiv Mehra, ASG with Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate for R-1.
Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for R-2.
Mr.K.C.Mittal and Ms.Anjali Nehra, Advocate for R-3.
Ms.Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv., Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Anil Soni,
Mr.S.S.Shamshery, Advocates for R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
19.03.2013
Respondents no.3 and 4 have been served and have entered
appearance.
Insofar as respondent no.1 is concerned, learned counsel for
respondent no.1 states that an affidavit has been filed but it covers
part of the first aspect raised in the order dated 04.02.2013. It is
stated that a further affidavit would be required to be filed qua the
remaining part of the first issue and the second issue.
W.P.(C) 131/2013 Page 1 of 2
A perusal of the affidavit filed in pursuance to the last order
shows that inter-ministerial co-ordination is required and thus an
officer of sufficient seniority to affirm the affidavit to be filed
within four weeks as prayed for.
Copies of the affidavit filed by respondent no.1 be also supplied
to respondents no.3 and 4 who may file their counter affidavits within
three weeks thereafter as prayed for meeting not only the allegations in
the petition but also any allegation which they would like to meet as set
out in the affidavit of the Union of India.
Rejoinders be filed within two weeks as prayed for.
List on 16.7.2013.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 19, 2013
nandan
W.P.(C) 131/2013 Page 2 of 2
$ 3
========================================================================================
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS
AND ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Prashant Bhushan and Mr Pranav Sachdeva,
Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, Ms Richa Kapoor and Mr
Kartikey Mahajan, Advocates for respondent No. 1
Mr Y.R. Sharma, Advocate for Election
Commissioner
Mr Pinky Anand, Senior Advocate with Mr Anil
Soni and Mr S.S. Shamshery, Advocates for
respondent No. 4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
16.07.2013
The affidavit supposed to be filed by the respondent No. 1 has not yet been filed. As a final opportunity we grant a further three weeks
time to file the affidavit. Any other respondent who wishes to file any
affidavit, may also do so within this period of three weeks. In case, a
rejoinder is necessary, the same be filed within one week thereafter.
Renotify on 21.08.2013.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 16, 2013/SU
$ 29
=====================================================================================
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS
AND ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Prashant Bhushan and Mr Pranav Sachdeva,
Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, Ms Richa Kapoor and Mr
Kartikey Mahajan, Advocates for respondent No. 1
Mr Y.R. Sharma, Advocate for Election
Commissioner
Mr Pinky Anand, Senior Advocate with Mr Anil
Soni and Mr S.S. Shamshery, Advocates for
respondent No. 4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
16.07.2013
The affidavit supposed to be filed by the respondent No. 1 has not yet been filed. As a final opportunity we grant a further three weeks
time to file the affidavit. Any other respondent who wishes to file any
affidavit, may also do so within this period of three weeks. In case, a
rejoinder is necessary, the same be filed within one week thereafter.
Renotify on 21.08.2013.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 16, 2013/SU
$ 29
=====================================================================================
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR
..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Pranav Sachdeva, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Kartikey Mahajan, Advocate for
R-1.
Mr P.R. Chopra, Advocate for R-2. Mr K.C. Mittal, Advocate for R-3.
Ms Pinky Anand, Sr. Advocate with Mr Anil Soni, Mr S.R. Soren and Mr
Natasha Saharawat, Advocates for R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
21.08.2013
Mr Rajeeve Mehra, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on
behalf of the Union of India (respondent no. 1) states that he has filed
an additional affidavit on 19.08.2013 vide diary no. 124203. The same is
not on record. The Registry shall place it on record. A copy of the
affidavit has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr Mittal the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3
states that counter affidavit is ready and shall be filed in the course
of the day. An advance copy has been handed over to the learned counsel
for the petitioner.
The rejoinder affidavit, if necessary, be filed within a week.
Renotify on 25.09.2013.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 21, 2013
RK/MK
$ 7 and 8
====================================================================================================
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR
..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Pranav Sachdeva, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Kartikey Mahajan, Advocate for
R-1.
Mr P.R. Chopra, Advocate for R-2. Mr K.C. Mittal, Advocate for R-3.
Ms Pinky Anand, Sr. Advocate with Mr Anil Soni, Mr S.R. Soren and Mr
Natasha Saharawat, Advocates for R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
21.08.2013
Mr Rajeeve Mehra, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on
behalf of the Union of India (respondent no. 1) states that he has filed
an additional affidavit on 19.08.2013 vide diary no. 124203. The same is
not on record. The Registry shall place it on record. A copy of the
affidavit has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr Mittal the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3
states that counter affidavit is ready and shall be filed in the course
of the day. An advance copy has been handed over to the learned counsel
for the petitioner.
The rejoinder affidavit, if necessary, be filed within a week.
Renotify on 25.09.2013.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 21, 2013
RK/MK
$ 7 and 8
====================================================================================================
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC
REFORMS AND ANR. ??? ???????..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Adv. for Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ????..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-1.
Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. D. Shekhar,
Advs. for R-4.
Mr. K.C. Mittal, Adv. for R-3.
Mr. P.R. Chopra, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
25.09.2013
At the request of parties, list on 29th January, 2014.
CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMOHAN, J
SEPTEMBER 25, 2013
pmc
$ 13
W.P.(C) 131/2013
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC
REFORMS AND ANR. ??? ???????..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Adv. for Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ????..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-1.
Ms. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. D. Shekhar,
Advs. for R-4.
Mr. K.C. Mittal, Adv. for R-3.
Mr. P.R. Chopra, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
25.09.2013
At the request of parties, list on 29th January, 2014.
CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMOHAN, J
SEPTEMBER 25, 2013
pmc
$ 13
No comments:
Post a Comment